On the desk today · MSCI Inc.
They decide which countries are "emerging." Then they collect a fee on every dollar that follows.
| NYSE · MSCI |
The “SpaceX IPO” Window May Be Closing Fast
Mark Skousen believes the biggest money in the SpaceX IPO may be made before the public rush begins.
After correctly calling major historic turning points for decades, he says June could become critical for investors watching this story unfold.
The Toll on
Every Dollar That Moves
In 2019, MSCI reclassified Saudi Arabia from "frontier market" to "emerging market." The change was a single line in an index methodology update. Within months, an estimated $15 billion in new capital flowed into Saudi stocks. Fund managers had no choice. Their mandates tracked the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. If Saudi Arabia was in the index, the money followed. No analyst recommended it. No committee voted. One company in New York City drew a line on a map — and billions crossed it.
I was reviewing a portfolio statement a few months ago — a friend's retirement account. Most of his international exposure ran through a single ETF. I looked up the fund's benchmark. It was the MSCI All Country World Index. I realized that one company — not the fund company, not the brokerage — had decided which countries, which stocks, and in what proportion his savings were invested. He had no idea.
MSCI is not an investment firm. It doesn't manage money. It doesn't trade stocks. It creates the indexes — the lists — that tell trillions of dollars where to go. And every fund that follows one of those lists pays MSCI a fee. Not a large fee. About two to four basis points on assets — a fraction of a fraction. But when you collect that fraction on $16.5 trillion, it adds up to $3.1 billion a year.
The story starts in 1968, when a firm called Capital International began publishing indexes covering global stock markets outside the United States. In 1986, Morgan Stanley licensed those indexes and branded them "Morgan Stanley Capital International" — MSCI. The indexes became the standard benchmark for international investing. In 2007, Morgan Stanley spun MSCI out as a public company. Henry Fernandez, who had been running the business since 1998, became CEO and chairman. He still holds both titles today.
The numbers are clean and growing. In 2025, MSCI reported $3.1 billion in revenue — up about 10% from the year before. Net income was $1.2 billion. The company posted its 11th consecutive year of double-digit adjusted earnings-per-share growth. More than $16.5 trillion in assets are benchmarked to MSCI indexes worldwide. Of that, roughly $2.3 trillion sits in ETFs that pay MSCI a licensing fee on every dollar invested. When the market rises, the assets rise, and the fee rises — automatically. MSCI doesn't need to sell anything new. The money just grows.
|
June 12: 4,566X Bigger Than Amazon IPO?
Elon Musk has just confirmed the SpaceX IPO for Friday, June 12, 2026, at a valuation of up to $2 trillion.
For perspective, that means the SpaceX IPO could be as much as a mind-blowing 4,566X bigger than Amazon’s IPO.
Needless to say, there’s an extraordinary amount of money up for grabs as the company goes public.
Best of all, you can follow this strategy right inside your regular brokerage account and with as little as $100 and just a few minutes of time.
But you must hurry…
If you wait until after the IPO takes place on June 12, your chance to get a pre-IPO stake will be gone forever.
That 95% retention rate is the number I keep returning to. It means that in any given year, 95 out of 100 subscription clients renew. They don't shop around. They don't switch to a competing index. The cost of changing a benchmark — rewriting the prospectus, rebalancing the fund, explaining the shift to regulators and investors — is so high that almost no one does it. Once you build a product on an MSCI index, you stay.
The pricing power is structural. About 75% of MSCI's revenue comes from recurring subscriptions with one-to-three-year contracts. The rest comes from asset-based fees — a small percentage of assets under management in funds that use MSCI's name. When assets grow, the fee grows. Management has said pricing contributes low-to-mid single-digit percentage growth to subscription revenue each year. Nobody cancels over a 3% increase on a product their entire fund is built around.
I want you to sit with the Saudi Arabia story for a moment. One company — 6,000 employees in New York — changed a classification. Billions of dollars moved. No one in government made the decision. No regulator signed off. MSCI did it because its methodology said the country qualified. And the money followed because the funds had no choice. Henry Fernandez described the business recently as "the essential intelligence layer of global investing." That's a careful phrase. He didn't say tool. He didn't say service. He said layer — something underneath everything else, invisible, load-bearing, and paid for by everyone standing on top of it.
The flywheel runs on gravity. More assets flow into passive funds every year. Passive funds need an index. The most widely used international indexes are MSCI's. As assets grow, MSCI's fee income grows — without a single new contract. And MSCI keeps shrinking its own share count. Over the past decade, the company repurchased roughly 40% of its outstanding shares. Revenue rises with assets. Shares fall with buybacks. Earnings per share compound from both directions.
WHY THIS WORKS
The index is the infrastructure. Trillions of dollars are wired to follow MSCI's lists. Changing the benchmark means rewriting the fund. Almost no one does it. The index is the rails.
Revenue rises with the market. Asset-based fees grow automatically as fund assets appreciate. A rising market is a raise MSCI never has to ask for.
Passive investing is the tailwind. Every dollar that moves from active to passive needs an index to follow. MSCI owns the most-used international benchmarks. The secular shift feeds the toll.
Two-to-four basis points on $16 trillion. The fee is so small that no fund manager fights it. But collected across trillions, it generates $3.1 billion a year — and the toll never stops.
What most people miss: MSCI doesn't manage a single dollar. It just decides what the list says — which countries, which stocks, which weights. And then $16.5 trillion follows. The fee is two to four cents on every hundred dollars invested. No one notices. No one cancels. And the company has bought back 40% of its own shares in the last decade. The invisible toll on global capital — collected quietly, compounding constantly.
